Dropshipping on Shopify is still technically possible in 2026, but it has become an economic trap for almost every project. Two forces have closed the net. On one side, acquisition costs have exploded, while the model combines precisely the two weaknesses that make those costs fatal: a low average order value and low customer lifetime value. On the other, a regulatory shock few dropshippers saw coming: since July 1, 2026, parcels worth less than €150 arriving from non-EU countries are no longer exempt from customs duties when entering the European Union. At Stellar, we have run our own brands. One of them, Superbon, lost 70% of its revenue in three weeks after the iOS 14 update, despite a 79% gross margin. It is this post-mortem, backed by numbers, that shapes our view of dropshipping.
This article is not yet another tutorial on launching a dropshipping store in ten minutes. It is the clear-eyed assessment of an agency that builds lasting brands, and that looks at the dropshipping model through the eyes of someone who has already paid the bill.
Contents
What exactly is dropshipping on Shopify?
Dropshipping is a sales model in which the merchant holds no inventory. When a customer orders from the store, the merchant passes the order on to a third-party supplier, often based in Asia, which ships the product directly to the end customer. The seller never touches the goods. They pocket the difference between their selling price and the supplier's price.
On Shopify, the model is technically simple to set up. An app connects the store to a supplier catalog, imports product pages in a few clicks and automates order forwarding. In theory, you can therefore open a store with no inventory, no logistics and very little starting capital: a Shopify subscription, a dropshipping app, a domain name. It is exactly this promise of a near-zero barrier to entry that made the model successful, and that is also its structural weakness.
In practice, the typical flow comes down to three steps: the customer pays for the product on your store, you pay the supplier a lower price, the supplier ships. Your margin is the gap, minus the cost of attracting that customer. And it is precisely that last point, the acquisition cost, that changed everything.
Which dropshipping supplier should you choose on Shopify in 2026?
The ecosystem has organized itself into two families, and the gap between them has widened since the customs reform. Be careful, though: what triggers customs duties is not the platform's nationality, but the physical place the goods ship from. Several players operate on both sides, so you need to check the origin supplier by supplier.
| Supplier type | Examples | What the July 2026 reform changes |
|---|---|---|
| Gateways to Asian marketplaces | DSers (AliExpress), Zendrop, CJdropshipping | Flat import duty, two- to four-week delivery times, high dispute rate |
| Wholesalers shipping from the European Union | BigBuy (Spain), Brands Distribution (Italy), Webdrop (France) | Goods already in free circulation, no flat duty, delivery in a few days |
| Mixed marketplaces | Spocket or CJdropshipping's European warehouses | Depending on the departure warehouse, the duty applies or not, to be checked line by line |
Why dropshipping exploded, and why 2026 is no longer 2019
Between 2017 and 2020, dropshipping enjoyed a golden age. Advertising on Facebook and Instagram was cheap, targeting was remarkably precise, and a gadget product, a catchy video and a modest ad budget were often enough to generate profitable sales. The model relied on a simple equation: as long as the cost of acquiring a customer stayed well below the margin generated on the sale, the machine kept running.
Two shocks shattered that equation. First, Apple's iOS 14.5 update, rolled out in April 2021 with App Tracking Transparency: consent to ad tracking collapsed. Depending on the measurements and methodologies, between 15% and 25% of iOS users agree to be tracked, compared with more than 70% of users who were identifiable before. Meta's algorithm became partly blind overnight. Then came saturation: more and more advertisers competed for the same ad space, driving bids up.
The result: on the accounts we manage in fashion, beauty and food, we have seen customer acquisition cost rise from €15 to €40 in five years, a topic we cover in detail in our guide to Shopify conversion rate.
Dropshipping in 2026 therefore inherits an environment radically different from the one it was born in. The paid channel that made it profitable has become expensive, unstable and competitive. And the dropshipping model never built any engine other than that one.
What the July 2026 customs reform changes for dropshipping
This is the news most dropshipping courses have not yet caught up with: the cheap Asian parcel, the historical foundation of the model, now costs more to bring into Europe. Since July 1, 2026, the European Union has applied a flat customs duty of €3 per item category, meaning per tariff subheading present in the shipment, on e-commerce parcels worth less than €150 coming from non-EU countries. The exemption these shipments enjoyed is gone, following the removal, back in July 2021, of the VAT exemption on parcels under €22.
The European Commission itself gives the two reference examples: five T-shirts bought together incur €3, since they fall under a single tariff classification, while three T-shirts and a watch incur €6, since two classifications are involved. There is no cap per parcel: the more varied your cart, the higher the bill.
The figures that prompted the reform show the scale of the phenomenon. Again according to the Commission, 5.9 billion items shipped in low-value parcels entered the EU market without paying customs duties in 2025, and more than 16 million parcels bound for European consumers are cleared through customs every day. An EU-wide investigation carried out in 2025 showed that more than 60% of low-value goods do not meet applicable product requirements or safety standards.
Three points matter for a Shopify merchant.
- The duty is declared and paid by the seller, the importer or the platform involved in the sale and transport, not by the consumer at the customs counter: it therefore flows into your purchase price, often without an identifiable line on the invoice.
- An EU handling fee is due to complement the system no later than November 1, 2026, with its amount still to be set by delegated act.
- This flat rate is only a first step: from July 2028, ordinary customs duties will apply via the EU customs data platform, with rates calculated product by product.
The move is not isolated. The United States suspended its $800 de minimis exemption on August 29, 2025. France had introduced its own national tax of €2 per item category on March 1, 2026, applied until June 30, before suspending it in favor of the European system, as confirmed by the French Ministry of the Economy. The convergence is clear on both sides of the Atlantic, and nothing points to a reversal.
What the flat customs duty does to a dropshipping margin
Let's take a textbook case, deliberately favorable to the dropshipper. A product bought for €4 from an Asian supplier, resold for €24.90 excl. VAT, or €29.88 incl. VAT, with a customer acquisition cost of €20, which is still optimistic in a competitive vertical. Amounts are excl. VAT and excluding payment transaction fees.
| Per single-item order | Before July 1, 2026 | Since July 1, 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Selling price excl. VAT | €24.90 | €24.90 |
| Supplier cost | €4.00 | €4.00 |
| Flat customs duty | €0 | €3.00 |
| Gross margin before acquisition | €20.90 | €17.90 |
| Margin after a €20 CAC | €0.90 | €2.10 loss |
Three euros seems trivial. Compared with a €4 purchase cost, it represents a 75% additional charge on the product line, and it tips an already tight operation into the red. On a cart made up of products from different tariff categories, the effect multiplies, with no cap per parcel.
A model that only survives thanks to a customs exemption is not a business model, it is a window of opportunity.
The practical consequence is already visible among our clients: those who sold imported products are shifting their sourcing to European wholesalers or to stock held in Europe. The topic of shipping costs and who covers them is becoming central again, because that is now where part of the margin is won or lost.
Our Shopify agency view: why dropshipping is nearly dead
Let's be clear: at Stellar, we consider pure dropshipping to be an economically doomed model for the vast majority of projects in 2026. This is not an ideological stance, it is a conclusion drawn from the field, including from our own failures. Our brand Superbon is the most direct illustration.
Superbon had just lost 70% of its revenue in three weeks. iOS 14 had swept everything away.
Yet Superbon was not dropshipping. It was a real solid cosmetics brand, with a well-controlled product and a theoretical gross margin of 79%. And it still gave way. If a properly built brand barely holds up, a dropshipping model, which has no brand, no control over the product and no pricing power, is by design even more fragile. Here is why.
Acquisition costs have exploded
Customer acquisition cost, or CAC, measures how much you spend on advertising to acquire a customer. At Superbon, at launch, we had a stable return on ad spend (ROAS) of around 5, and a CAC of €6. That was healthy. After iOS 14, ROAS dropped to 2, sometimes less, and CAC rose to €15, then €18, sometimes €20. The same ad was bringing in two to three times less.
Even with a ROAS of 5, contribution margins did not allow us to build a solid structure without reaching considerable volumes.
If even a ROAS of 5 was not enough for a brand with a 79% gross margin, imagine the situation of a dropshipper reselling an imported product with a much thinner margin, in an environment where CAC has risen further and where customs now take their cut.
Without a high average order value or LTV, the equation no longer works
When the cost of acquiring a customer rises, there are only two ways to absorb it: sell at a high price from the first order (a high average order value), or bring the customer back often enough to make the acquisition pay off over time (a high customer lifetime value, or LTV). LTV is simple to calculate: average order value, multiplied by the number of orders per year, multiplied by the length of the relationship. A customer who spends €50, four times a year, for three years, is worth €600, not €50.
This is where dropshipping collapses. By nature, it relies on commoditized products, bought on impulse, with no attachment to a brand. The average order value is low, and the customer almost never comes back. Neither of the two survival levers can be activated. The table below sums up the contrast.
| Survival criterion | Pure dropshipping | Built brand |
|---|---|---|
| Average order value | Low, commoditized products | High, perceived value and product range |
| Customer lifetime value (LTV) | Close to zero, one-off impulse purchase | High, repeat purchases and loyalty |
| Pricing power | None, identical product at 100 competitors | Real, justified by the brand |
| Ability to absorb a high CAC | Very low | Good, CAC is spread over LTV |
| Exposure to customs duties | Direct, on every imported shipment | Limited, inventory and production under control |
The Superbon proof: our post-mortem in numbers
Here are our brand's real figures, as we analyze them in our book. At the start, the model seemed to hold up. A solid shampoo sold for €9.90 incl. VAT, or €8.25 excl. VAT, for a production cost of €1.70: a unit gross margin of €6.55, or 79%. With an average order value of €30 and three products per order, we generated about €19.65 of gross margin per order. After deducting CAC and fees (platform, payment transactions, returns), €11.25 of contribution margin remained. Comfortable, on the face of it.
| Indicator (per €30 order) | Before iOS 14 | After iOS 14 |
|---|---|---|
| ROAS | 5 | 2 or less |
| Customer acquisition cost (CAC) | €6 | €15 to €20 |
| Net contribution margin | €11.25 | €2.25 |
Let's calculate the viability threshold. To pay two founders and a first employee, we needed about €13,500 of monthly contribution margin. Before iOS 14, at €11.25 per order, that meant 1,200 orders per month, or €432,000 in annual revenue. We were plateauing at around 300 to 400 orders per month. After iOS 14, at €2.25 per order, the same structure would have required 6,000 orders per month. The viability threshold had been multiplied by five overnight.
We were stuck on a subsistence plateau.
The lesson applies directly to dropshipping. Superbon's problem was not the product, nor even the ROAS at the start. It was structural: a model that depended 85% on a single paid channel, with no margin or repeat-purchase lever to absorb the rise in CAC. Dropshipping reproduces exactly this pattern, only worse.
How much does a dropshipper really earn in 2026?
It is the question we get asked most often, and the honest answer is that there is no typical salary, only a contribution margin per order to multiply by a volume. Let's go back to the simulation above: a €2.10 loss per order on a product imported at €4 and sold at €24.90 with a €20 CAC. No volume can make up for a negative margin.
In a more favorable scenario, at €5 of contribution margin per order, you need to sell about ten times a day to reach €1,500 of monthly income, before social charges, subscriptions, apps and hours of customer service. At €2 of margin, you need 750 sales a month. It is these orders of magnitude, not screenshots of dashboards, that should guide a launch decision.
The four structural risks of dropshipping in 2026
Beyond the numbers, it is the very structure of dropshipping that is the problem. We assess it using the same framework we apply to our own brands. Four dependencies make it indefensible over time.
| Risk | Why it is a problem | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Dependence on a single channel | Almost all traffic comes from paid advertising (Meta, TikTok) | One algorithm update or bid increase, and everything stops |
| Dependence on acquisition | The model lives on new customers, not on retention | Every sale starts from zero, no cumulative effect |
| No control over margin | Identical product available from dozens of competitors | Price driven down, margin cannot be improved |
| Dependence on a logistics corridor | The product comes from Asia, subject to customs duties, delays and inspections | One customs rule changes and the margin is cut overnight |
The day the channel stops, there is nothing left behind it.
A resilient brand diversifies its growth sources well before it needs to: SEO, email, word of mouth, retail. Dropshipping, on the other hand, puts all its eggs in the advertising basket, the most expensive and volatile of all. That is precisely the setup we steer clear of when we build a serious store, as we explain in our guide to launching a Shopify store.
Is dropshipping legal in France?
Yes, dropshipping is legal in France: no law prohibits it. Doing dropshipping on Shopify is therefore not illegal in itself. However, the way it is carried out is very often illegal, and that is where many people get it wrong: having no inventory does not change your legal status. You are the seller, fully and solely liable to the customer, exactly as if you were shipping from your garage.
Inspections show the message is not getting through. In its investigation conducted in 2022 and published in November 2023, the DGCCRF (the French consumer protection authority) inspected 215 websites and found irregularities on 116 of them, more than half. The follow-up measures set the tone, with several measures potentially targeting the same site: 26 warnings, 67 injunctions, 22 criminal reports, 9 administrative reports and 88 digital requisitions to restrict or block access to illegal sites. The most frequent breaches are always the same: concealed seller identity, misleading delivery times, fake customer reviews, unfair terms releasing the seller from liability, and the sale of dangerous or prohibited products.
Your obligations as a seller, even without inventory
| Obligation | What it means in practice | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-contractual information | Seller's identity and contact details, total price, actual (not theoretical) delivery time | Article L.221-5 of the French Consumer Code |
| Online withdrawal function | Free, legible and directly accessible button, mandatory since June 19, 2026 | Articles L.221-21 and D.221-5, Ordinance No. 2026-2 and Decree No. 2026-3 of January 5, 2026 |
| Legal guarantee of conformity | Two years, at your expense, however responsive the supplier is | Articles L.217-3 et seq. |
| VAT and invoicing | Collection, filing and one-stop shop depending on the sales channel | OSS and IOSS schemes |
| Customs duties | €3 per item category, on shipments under €150 | EU customs reform, July 1, 2026 |
Failure to meet the information obligations of Article L.221-5 exposes you to an administrative fine of up to €15,000 for an individual and €75,000 for a legal entity, under Article L.242-10 of the French Consumer Code. Failure to provide a withdrawal function falls under Article L.242-13, with the same caps. On the tax side, our article on VAT and Shopify invoices explains how the EU one-stop shop works, and our returns policy guide covers bringing the withdrawal button into compliance.
The special case of influencer marketing
Article 6 of the French law of June 9, 2023 on commercial influence specifically targeted dropshipping promoted on social media. An influencer who sells through dropshipping must provide the information set out in Article L.221-5 of the French Consumer Code as well as the supplier's identity, ensure the products sold are available and lawful, in particular that they are not counterfeit, and is automatically liable to the buyer under Article 15 of the LCEN (the French law on confidence in the digital economy). In other words, they cannot hide behind the supplier in the event of a dispute.
The regulatory trend continues. Definitively adopted by the Senate on June 29, 2026, the so-called anti fast-fashion law was enacted on July 8, 2026 as Law No. 2026-602. Since September 1, 2026, it has introduced a progressive financial penalty that can reach €20 per item in 2030, capped at 50% of the selling price excl. VAT, and it will ban all advertising for ultra fast-fashion players from January 1, 2027, influencers included. The thresholds defining ultra fast-fashion are still to be set by decree, and the European Commission has expressed reservations about the compatibility of the advertising provisions with EU law. The platforms targeted first are precisely those that supply most textile dropshipping catalogs.
Are there still opportunities in dropshipping in 2026?
Let's be honest: saying a model is 100% dead would be dishonest. There are still four cases where dropshipping remains worthwhile, provided you see it as a one-off tool and not as a lasting business model.
- Product validation. Before investing in inventory, testing demand for a few weeks through dropshipping can prevent a costly mistake. It is a tactical use, not an end in itself.
- Niches with a genuinely high average order value, on differentiated, low-competition products, where the absolute margin per sale absorbs a €30 or €40 CAC and customs duties. Our cabin bed brand Cabania illustrates this high-order-value logic, even though it relies on inventory we hold. These niches exist, but they dry up quickly once they are spotted.
- Brand dropshipping, meaning outsourcing the logistics of products you have actually designed, which has little to do with classic Asian dropshipping anymore.
- European sourcing, which has become more relevant since July 2026. A wholesaler whose goods are already in free circulation in the EU avoids the flat duty, cuts delivery times to a few days and simplifies returns. Purchase prices are higher, but the gap has narrowed significantly once customs, delivery times and dispute rates are factored into the calculation.
Outside these specific situations, our position is consistent. There are probably still plays to be made, but no project has convinced us yet. As long as it brings neither a high average order value, nor repeat purchases, nor brand-driven pricing power, the equation remains a losing one. It is the same reasoning we apply when we give our agency review of Shopify: the platform is excellent, but it never makes up for a shaky business model.
The alternative: from dropshipping to a real brand
The good news is that the energy invested in a dropshipping project can be redirected toward a model that stands up. The path involves three concrete shifts.
First, gain pricing power by building a brand that justifies its value, instead of reselling a generic product. Next, work on average order value and customer lifetime value, because that is where your ability to absorb a high acquisition cost is decided.
When you sell recurrence, you are no longer selling a product. You are selling a relationship. And a relationship is calculated over three years, not over one order.
We experienced this firsthand when supporting the launch of Stan Bio, a dog food brand. Pet food is a tight-margin, ultra-competitive sector, but subscription changes everything: you no longer think in terms of acquisition cost per order, but in terms of LTV. A customer who costs €40 to acquire but spends €600 over two years becomes very profitable. When recurrence is not natural, the solution is to broaden the brand's territory to increase customer lifetime value in other ways. On the retention side, email and SMS are decisive levers, as we explain in our article on Klaviyo and retention.
Finally, diversify acquisition so you no longer depend on a single channel. In practice, this means setting up three engines in parallel: your store's SEO, which builds a traffic asset no one can take away from you, a carefully crafted product feed for Google Shopping, and a contact base that you own. It is the exact opposite of the dropshipping logic, and it is the foundation of a model that lasts.
This systemic approach is at the heart of our method, set out in our book Créer sa marque à l'ère de l'IA (Building your brand in the age of AI) and confirmed by the 2026 e-commerce trends.
Building a brand does not start with creating a product. It starts with building a defensible business model.